MIAMI, FL — May 2025: Mayor Daniella Levine Cava of Miami-Dade County has taken a firm stance on Florida’s controversial decision to ban fluoride from public water systems, engaging with local communities about the potential health implications of this policy.
In a recent appearance on That Part Podcast, Mayor Daniella Levine Cava discussed the Florida legislature’s decision to ban the addition of fluoride to public drinking water, a measure that has been met with strong opposition from many health professionals, community leaders, and residents. The move has sparked a heated debate about the long-term health implications, particularly for children and vulnerable populations, who have historically benefited from fluoride’s role in preventing tooth decay.
Background on the Fluoride Ban
The fluoride ban was passed by the Florida legislature in early 2025, and it has rapidly become a contentious issue. Supporters of the ban argue that fluoride should not be added to water due to concerns over potential health risks. They point to studies that suggest long-term exposure to high levels of fluoride could be linked to certain health issues, including neurological problems and bone density concerns. However, many public health organizations, including the American Dental Association (ADA) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), have long argued that fluoride is a safe and effective measure for preventing cavities and promoting overall oral health.
Despite the overwhelming consensus among health experts, the decision to ban fluoride in drinking water has sparked a division in the state, with some individuals and advocacy groups pushing for public education on the matter. Public health officials in Miami-Dade County, led by Mayor Cava, have responded with concern, emphasizing the importance of providing residents with clear information about the potential effects of the ban.
Mayor Levine Cava’s Stance
Mayor Levine Cava has been an outspoken critic of the fluoride ban, citing the potential harm it could cause to the local population, particularly children. In her podcast interview, she described the ban as a “misstep” that could have serious health consequences for Miami residents. The mayor emphasized that fluoride has played a key role in reducing tooth decay, particularly in lower-income communities, where access to dental care might be limited.
“Fluoride is a crucial public health tool that has been used for decades to reduce cavities and improve oral health. Removing it from our water could reverse years of progress, particularly in underserved communities,” Mayor Levine Cava said. She also pointed out that Miami-Dade has a significant number of residents who rely on the public water supply for their primary source of drinking water.
Local Reactions and Concerns
The mayor’s comments reflect widespread concerns within the local community. Pediatricians, dentists, and other healthcare professionals in Miami have also expressed their dismay over the ban, arguing that it could lead to an increase in dental problems, especially in children. Dr. Samantha Morales, a local pediatric dentist, voiced her concerns in a public statement, saying, “As a pediatric dentist, I see firsthand the positive impact fluoride has on young children’s dental health. This decision could mean more cavities and increased healthcare costs for families who can’t afford private dental care.”
Miami residents are also divided on the issue. Some believe that parents should have the right to decide whether their children should receive fluoride, rather than mandating it in the water supply. However, many people who live in low-income areas have expressed concern that removing fluoride could disproportionately affect them, as they may not have access to private dental care or fluoride treatments.
“We have a large population of families in our area who rely on public services. If they can’t afford dental insurance, fluoride in our water is their best option for oral health,” said Rosa Garcia, a community advocate in Miami. “This decision feels like it’s going to harm the people who need the most help.”
The Health and Legal Implications
The ban on fluoride has sparked significant legal and health debates in Florida. Several local public health groups, led by organizations like the Florida Public Health Association, have filed lawsuits against the state, arguing that the decision violates the rights of local governments to make health-related decisions. Miami-Dade County has not yet taken legal action but has pledged to fight for public health protections on a local level.
“The county is committed to ensuring the health and safety of our residents,” Mayor Levine Cava stated in a public statement. “We will continue to work with local health officials, experts, and the community to explore ways to mitigate the effects of this ban and ensure that no one is left behind when it comes to basic health protections.”
One of the legal challenges surrounding the fluoride ban centers on the issue of public health authority. While the state government has banned fluoride in public water, many local governments, including Miami-Dade County, believe that decisions about public health should be made on a local level. Health experts argue that communities should have the option to continue fluoridating their water supplies if they choose.
Despite the controversy, state lawmakers have stood by their decision, stating that they are prioritizing the rights of individuals to make their own choices about their health. Florida Governor Ron DeSantis, who has supported the ban, maintains that the fluoride decision is in line with personal freedom and parental rights.
The Role of Public Health Education
In response to the growing concerns, Miami-Dade public health officials have begun educating the community on the potential alternatives to water fluoridation. These efforts include providing information about the importance of dental hygiene, promoting regular dental visits, and encouraging fluoride toothpaste use.
While Mayor Levine Cava and local health experts are pushing for more education on the topic, they argue that it’s critical to emphasize that fluoride in water has had a long track record of success in reducing tooth decay on a large scale. Public health campaigns are now in full swing, aimed at informing the community about the potential downsides of the fluoride ban and how to protect their oral health in light of these changes.
“We’re working to ensure that every resident of Miami-Dade understands the risks associated with this decision and how they can protect their family’s oral health moving forward,” said Dr. Jaime Rivera, the Director of Public Health for Miami-Dade County. “We want people to be informed so they can make the best possible decisions for themselves and their children.”
Looking Ahead: The Future of Fluoride in Florida
As the state’s fluoride ban continues to spark controversy, many are questioning what the future holds for public health policies in Florida. Will other states follow suit, or will the medical and dental communities push back hard enough to reinstate fluoride in public water systems?
For now, Miami-Dade County plans to continue its fight to protect its residents’ health. Mayor Levine Cava has promised to keep the conversation alive, ensuring that local communities are involved in discussions about public health.
While the final outcome of this issue remains uncertain, one thing is clear: the fluoride debate in Florida is far from over. As local leaders like Mayor Levine Cava advocate for public health protections, they’re reminding the state that the health of the community must always come first.
Conclusion
The fluoride ban in Florida has opened up a wide-reaching debate about public health, individual rights, and the role of local governments in protecting the well-being of residents. As Miami-Dade County continues to fight for its residents’ health, the conversation about the fluoride ban is far from settled. Miamians, along with public health officials, are hopeful that through education, advocacy, and legal action, the state will reconsider its decision and work toward solutions that protect the health of all citizens.